Letters to the Editor: Confusion at Advocis?
It seems contradictory to ask for both the retention of embedded fees and higher standards for financial advisors
- By: John De Goey
- May 10, 2016 November 12, 2019
- 13:00
It seems contradictory to ask for both the retention of embedded fees and higher standards for financial advisors
To protect clients, Advocis supports a new professional accreditation for financial advisors. Failure to do so will leave regulatory gaps.
Only regulating the title “financial planner” still leaves consumers at risk
Where are the safeguards to ensure fee-based advisors aren’t collecting a fee for doing nothing?
Gross is not saying that advice shouldn't be paid for; he is only saying that the investment advice that investors receive should be unbiased of…
Editorial
Editorial: Last-minute policy reversals undermine an already fragile trust between tax authorities and the public
CEO Ken Rae sells his stake but stays on as key leader
The Liberals’ re-election prospects look promising thanks to the co-operation of Big Pharma
Why the energy transition still matters
Hint: it has nothing to do with how frequently these investments are priced
We can’t rule out a future change to the capital gains inclusion rate, but Ottawa has reversed course for now
Cait’s policy contract review framework is the right template, but it should be a regulatory requirement
The move will serve as a critical test of whether Ontario will act with speed and purpose to realize CFTA's potential
Prompt complaint resolution is key to capital market integrity — the SRO’s phase six rule consolidation whiffed
The wrong side of history
Editorial