Letters to the Editor: Proficiency, not commissions, reduces number of advisors
It’s worth reviewing the experience of the U.K., where advisors have faced higher proficiency standards since 2013
- By: Kelly Rogers
- May 11, 2016 November 12, 2019
- 11:00
It’s worth reviewing the experience of the U.K., where advisors have faced higher proficiency standards since 2013
John De Goey’s response to Advocis fails to address how clients will suffer if many have to leave the business
It seems contradictory to ask for both the retention of embedded fees and higher standards for financial advisors
To protect clients, Advocis supports a new professional accreditation for financial advisors. Failure to do so will leave regulatory gaps.
Only regulating the title “financial planner” still leaves consumers at risk
Where are the safeguards to ensure fee-based advisors aren’t collecting a fee for doing nothing?
Gross is not saying that advice shouldn't be paid for; he is only saying that the investment advice that investors receive should be unbiased of…
Financial advisors should have a regulatory structure similar to those of lawyers, accountants, dentists and other professionals
There needs to be a national organization that governs financial planning with ethics and educational standards
OLHI finds that non-binding recommendations are effective
Seniors are disproportionately exploited by advisors