Skip to content
Opens in a new window Opens an external site Opens an external site in a new window
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Perspective
  • Report Cards
  • Partner Content
  • CE Corner
  • Soundbites
MFDA targets firms’ performance reporting
Regulation

MFDA targets firms’ performance reporting

Fund dealers were advised to examine their client reports for unusual or incorrect information

February 24, 2021

James Langton

Share

Related

  • Product roundup: Two new ETFs target defence sector 
  • Industry moves: Wellington-Altus adds Saint John advisor team
  • Provinces hang on to ‘AA’ ratings: Fitch

The Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (MFDA) is putting client performance reporting from fund dealers under the microscope.

In a bulletin to the industry, the MFDA set out its compliance priorities for the year ahead, highlighting a focus on dealers’ reporting to clients.

The self-regulatory organization noted it’s currently conducting a targeted examination of firms’ performance reports “to assess whether performance data was accurately reported to clients.”

In its notice, the MFDA said firms should “carefully review and test their annual performance reporting…. Where unexpected or unusual returns are identified, it is important for [dealers] to investigate such instances to identify the specific cause and determine the extent of any issue.”

Recently, the British Columba Securities Commission (BCSC) also said its compliance work has found shortcomings in client performance reporting among the firms it oversees directly.

Among other things, the BCSC found firms that didn’t provide clients with required reports, reports that didn’t include required information, and firms that failed to oversee the production of these reports by third parties.

Apart from performance reporting, another key issue for the MFDA is the distribution of alternative funds.

In January, the Canadian Securities Administrators issued blanket relief designed to make it easier for fund reps to qualify to deal in liquid alternative funds.

For firms that distribute alt funds, the MFDA said that “in addition to examining [dealers’] product due diligence practices and performing suitability testing, we will also be assessing compliance with the blanket relief orders.”

The introduction of continuing education (CE) requirements is also a focus for the MFDA this year.

In particular, it will be seeking CSA approval for proposed accreditation standards and completing the development of its tracking system, known as CERTS.

“CERTS system testing is currently underway and policy development is in the final stages of completion,” it said. “Once the accreditation standards and CERTS system are finalized, there will be a transition period before the CE requirements come into effect.”

Other initiatives in 2021 include a cybersecurity survey and another client research request to industry firms.

Read next

  • Judge failed to consider trust account fail

  • Rep that ran 25-year Ponzi scheme heading to jail

  • U.S. advisor pleads guilty to cherry picking

Investment Executive

Follow us:

  • linkedin

  • News
    • Industry
    • Regulation
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Product
    • Tax and Estate
    • People
  • Perspective
    • Editorials
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Columns
  • Report Cards
    • Brokerage Report Card
    • Dealers’ Report Card
    • Report Card on Banks
    • Advisors’ Report Card
    • Special Reports
  • Partner Content
    • Appointment Notices
    • Brand Knowledge
    • Expert Advice
    • Partner Reports
    • Webinars
    • Events
  • CE Corner
  • Soundbites
Subscribe Log In

  • About Us
  • Statement of Ethics
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Advertise
  • AI Policy
  • Contact Us

Newcom Media

© 2026 Newcom Media Inc.

Our Brands

  • Finance et Investissement
  • Advisor.ca
  • Conseiller.ca