Skip to content
Opens in a new window Opens an external site Opens an external site in a new window
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Perspective
  • Report Cards
  • Partner Content
  • CE Corner
  • Soundbites
MFDA unmasks performance reporting issues
Regulation

MFDA unmasks performance reporting issues

SRO review finds a variety of reasons for botched return calculations

July 26, 2021
People of different backgrounds wearing masks

James Langton

Share

Related

  • Product roundup: Two new ETFs target defence sector 
  • Industry moves: Wellington-Altus adds Saint John advisor team
  • Provinces hang on to ‘AA’ ratings: Fitch

Fund dealers make a variety of errors that can produce incorrect performance reporting for clients, a review by the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (MFDA) has found.

The self-regulatory organization examined account-level performance data — collected for the first time as part of MFDA’s ongoing Client Research Project — and focused on accounts that displayed unusual returns (both positive and negative).

The analysis found a variety of reasons for aberrant returns, including firms using incorrect values for investments, improperly accounting for cash flows, using incorrect dates and not including all investments in the calculations.

The report noted that the issues uncovered in the review tended to be account- or investment-specific, and don’t indicate widespread issues with performance reporting in the industry.

Additionally, the report noted that returns calculated with the money-weighted methodology can produce unusual (but not inaccurate) results, given that both the size and timing of cash flows impact reported returns.

Under the methodology, “gains or losses can be particularly magnified for transactions that happen near the end of the year, especially where the late-year transactions are very large relative to the size of the account,” the report said. “As a result, there can be unusual returns even when there are no errors in the calculation.”

Both dealers and reps should be aware of the possibility of unusual return reporting, the report said, “and should be prepared to discuss the rate of return with clients.”

The MFDA said firms should regularly review their own performance reporting to catch the kinds of issues uncovered in its review. And if clients have been given incorrect reports, dealers should provide affected investors with restated performance reports.

“Members are reminded to carefully review and test their annual performance reporting, as inaccurate reporting can impact investment decisions,” the report said.

The MFDA said it will continue to review performance reporting in its compliance reviews.

Read next

  • Judge failed to consider trust account fail

  • Rep that ran 25-year Ponzi scheme heading to jail

  • U.S. advisor pleads guilty to cherry picking

Investment Executive

Follow us:

  • linkedin

  • News
    • Industry
    • Regulation
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Product
    • Tax and Estate
    • People
  • Perspective
    • Editorials
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Columns
  • Report Cards
    • Brokerage Report Card
    • Dealers’ Report Card
    • Report Card on Banks
    • Advisors’ Report Card
    • Special Reports
  • Partner Content
    • Appointment Notices
    • Brand Knowledge
    • Expert Advice
    • Partner Reports
    • Webinars
    • Events
  • CE Corner
  • Soundbites
Subscribe Log In

  • About Us
  • Statement of Ethics
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Advertise
  • AI Policy
  • Contact Us

Newcom Media

© 2026 Newcom Media Inc.

Our Brands

  • Finance et Investissement
  • Advisor.ca
  • Conseiller.ca